#python #datastructure #designpatterns #permanentnote
Core Concept
Python offers multiple approaches to create structured data, each with distinct trade-offs between simplicity, performance, type safety, and functionality. Understanding when to use each pattern is crucial for writing maintainable and efficient code.
The Spectrum of Data Structure Patterns
1. Built-in Tuples (Simplest)
- When: Quick, temporary groupings of heterogeneous data
- Trade-offs: No named access, limited readability for complex structures
- Best for: Coordinates, RGB values, simple return values
point = (3, 4) # Simple but lacks semantic meaning
2. Named Tuples (collections.namedtuple)
- When: Need named access with minimal overhead
- Trade-offs: Runtime creation, limited IDE support, no type hints
- Best for: Simple records where performance matters
Point = namedtuple('Point', ['x', 'y'])
p = Point(3, 4) # p.x, p.y accessible
3. Typed Named Tuples (typing.NamedTuple)
- When: Want type safety with named tuple benefits
- Trade-offs: Better IDE support than collections.namedtuple, still immutable
- Best for: Type-safe simple records
class Point(NamedTuple):
x: int
y: int
4. Data Classes (Most Versatile)
- When: Need mutable objects with rich functionality
- Trade-offs: More memory overhead, but maximum flexibility
- Best for: Complex business objects, API models, configuration objects
@dataclass
class Point:
x: int
y: int
def distance_from_origin(self) -> float:
return (self.x ** 2 + self.y ** 2) ** 0.5
Decision Matrix
Pattern | Mutability | Type Hints | Methods | Performance | IDE Support |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
tuple | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ |
namedtuple | ❌ | ❌ | Limited | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
NamedTuple | ❌ | ✅ | Limited | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
dataclass | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
Evolution Path
Most projects naturally evolve along this progression:
- Start with tuples for rapid prototyping
- Upgrade to NamedTuple when readability becomes important
- Move to dataclass when you need methods or mutability
- Add custom methods as business logic grows
Key Insights
Immutability vs Flexibility: Early patterns prioritize immutability and performance, later patterns prioritize flexibility and maintainability.
Type Safety Evolution: Python’s approach shows gradual adoption of type safety—from no types (tuple) to full type support (dataclass).
Performance Trade-offs: More features generally mean more overhead, but the difference is often negligible in practice.
Practical Guidelines
Choose tuple when: You need a quick, temporary grouping and performance is critical.
Choose NamedTuple when: You want immutable records with named access and type safety.
Choose dataclass when: You need a full-featured class with methods, mutability, or complex initialization.
Don’t overthink it: You can always refactor from simpler to more complex patterns as requirements evolve.
Source
